This site works under the Honor System. Click here for payment instructions. Payment is much appreciated! |
No one can take the ultimate burden of decision-making off your shoulders, but the more you know, the lighter that burden will be.
[ Market Activity | Economic Reports | Anxiety (VIX) | After Hours | Fed Futures | Dollar | Oil | Gold | Geopolitical Situation | Terrorism | Iraq | Technology | Microsoft Antitrust | Books | Reform | Telecom | Miscellaneous | My Investments | Outlook for Today | Bottom Line | Economic Outlook | Tech Stock 'Safe' Signal | Resources | Disclaimer | Archive | Charts | Adages | Search | Payment | Contact Us ]
(Updated since Saturday – changes marked with [ * ])
Finally we got a little bounce on Friday. Nasdaq closed up 31 points from the low of the day and only 8 points off the high. That’s a respectable bounce. But I wouldn’t get too excited or relieved since there could have been a fair amount of short-covering in advance of the weekend.
In order for this bounce to truly mark the end of the correction, we need to see another strong day (at least 2% gain) within four to seven days, and certainly no decline below the low on Friday.
The weak employment report and resignation of Treasury Secretary O’Neill gave the market a decided negative tone at the open. All of this was such a silly knee-jerk reaction.
It was quite impressive that Nasdaq started to bounce barely five minutes after the open. Maybe it was that second resignation (Larry Lindsey) that suggested that the administration was getting serious about cleaning house. Unfortunately, by 10:40 a.m. Nasdaq bumped into resistance at the 1420 level and the recovery stalled until another valiant rally attempt between 1:30 p.m. and 2:45 p.m.
Nasdaq really struggled against the 1420/1425/1430 levels. This suggests that there was not much ‘real’ buying going on and that most of the day’s action was traders playing off technicals. Nasdaq managed to stay above 1425 for an hour in the afternoon, but only momentarily poked above 1430 on two occasions. The failure to break through 1430 on the second attempt probably triggered the minor pullback late in the afternoon. The September 21, 2001 closing level of 1423.19 was the real and final stumbling block that kept Nasdaq restrained in the final hour.
Volume was light (1.52 billion shares). Breadth was modestly positive, with 1.16 gainers for each loser. People seemed reluctant to commit to the market, either for buying or selling, in advance of the weekend, especially with the Iraqi weapons disclosure declaration due.
According to Thomson Financial I-Watch, institutional investors were net sellers of Sun (SUNW), but net buyers of Rational Software (RATL), Intel (INTC), Cisco (CSCO), JDS Uniphase (JDSU), Applied Materials (AMAT), Lucent (LU), EMC (EMC), and Oracle (ORCL). It is always comforting when the institutions are buying into a rally rather than selling into it. They recognized the dip as a great buying opportunity.
The Employment Situation report for November registered a modest decline in nonfarm payroll employment, or as the Department of labor put it, “little changed”. This was a slightly negative report. Overall, it was a very mixed picture and nowhere near as bad as the initial market reaction. The retail sector added jobs even as manufacturing jobs were lost. The population rose by 176,000, but the work force shrank by 390,000. Household employment shrank by 689,000 and household unemployment rose by 299,000. The unemployment rate rose from 5.7 to 6.0. The number of people not in the work force rose by 568,000. An additional 272,000 of those not in the labor force currently want a job. The unadjusted household data was not significantly different than the adjusted data. Nonfarm payroll employment shrank by 40,000, but unadjusted, actual nonfarm payroll employment rose by 100,000. Goods-producing payroll employment shrank by 51,000 (190,000 unadjusted). Manufacturing payroll employment shrank by 45,000 (73,000 unadjusted). Service-producing payroll employment rose by 11,000 (290,000 unadjusted). Of service-producing jobs, retail trade payroll employment shrank by 39,000 (but rose by 298,000 unadjusted – in anticipation of the holiday shopping season). Finance, insurance, and real estate payroll employment rose by 7,000 (12,000 unadjusted). Other services payroll employment rose by 50,000 (but shrank 162,000 unadjusted). Government payroll employment rose 8,000 (169,000 unadjusted). Federal government payroll employment rose 3,000 (7,000 unadjusted). State government payroll employment rose 1,000 (117,000 unadjusted). State education payroll employment was unchanged, but rose 27,000 unadjusted. State non-education payroll employment rose 1,000, but fell 10,000 unadjusted. Local government payroll employment rose 4,000 (145,000 unadjusted). Local education payroll employment shrank by 3,000, but rose 130,000 unadjusted. Local non-education payroll employment rose by 7,000 (14,000 unadjusted). The length of the average workweek was unchanged. The average hourly earnings rose slightly (0.3%) and the average weekly paycheck rose at the same rate. Overall, the report was fairly benign, despite the fact that many people had expected something better. The labor market is stagnant, but not deteriorating dramatically. Please note that employment is a lagging indicator and that unemployment frequently rises in a recovery until GDP growth exceeds the rate of productivity growth.
The Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI) Weekly Leading Index (WLI) registered a sharp gain and its six-month smoothed growth rate rose sharply (but is still fairly negative) and has now risen for five consecutive weeks. This was a positive report. The WLI is now back up to the level of mid-July. The WLI is still suggesting anemic growth at best, and possibly some weakness in the months ahead. The negative WLI growth rate doesn’t necessarily indicate an economic contraction ahead, but simply that growth will be below what we would like to see in a robust recovery. The good news is that there is a definite upwards trend. Even if the WLI makes no significant headway over the next few weeks, its smoothed growth rate will begin to go positive before the end of the year. Any dramatic, continued weakness in the stock market could change the picture though.
The Consumer Credit report for October registered only a very modest gain in consumer credit. This was a somewhat positive report. Credit card debt rose modestly, but non-revolving debt actually declined slightly. Consumers are still borrowing in moderation (a good sign), but not dramatically further overloading with debt either (another good sign).
[ * ] The DRAMeXchange Index (DXI) for DRAM memory chip prices registered a moderately sharp decline (7.7%) over the past week. This was a negative report, but there is a lot of volatility and some DRAM prices have already bounced.
The CBOE Market Volatility Index (VIX), which measures the level of anxiety in the market, fell by 4.67% on Friday to 32.68, which is slightly above the midpoint of the high anxiety zone (30 to 35). People were clearly relieved that the market was able to bounce, especially in light of the weak jobs report and the ‘resignations’ from the White House economic team. VIX did spike up to 35.58 (up in the very high anxiety zone) shortly after the open, but trailed off nicely for the rest of the day as the sell-off fizzled.
VIX has ‘rallied’ strongly over the past two weeks, and is now overextended and due for a pullback. That means that there is a likelihood of a continuation of the rally, but no certainty as to timing or duration.
The high level of VIX remains a contrarian bullish indicator, but the market could decline further before rallying again.
The Nasdaq-100 After Hours Indicator had a slightly positive tone for the Friday evening session, closing up 0.7 points. This was a typical Friday evening session with few people interested in changing their positions after the close of the day session. The calm is a relief.
Fed funds futures suggest a 12% (up from 9%) chance of a quarter-point rate cut by the December FOMC meeting. In other words, futures indicate that the Fed will not cut rates at the December 10 FOMC meeting.
Fed funds futures suggest a 12% (up from 8%) chance of a quarter-point rate cut by the January FOMC meeting. In other words, futures indicate that the Fed will not cut rates at the January 28/29 FOMC meeting.
The dollar fell moderately sharply against the yen and euro.
[ * ] There could be a moderate amount of speculative weakening of the dollar in anticipation that the new White House economic team may pursue additional fiscal stimulus which would increase the federal deficit and depress treasury prices, and that may put downwards pressure on the value of the dollar.
[UPDATED 7/23/02] There are still no signs of any economic fundamentals that would make either Europe or Japan dramatically more attractive than the U.S. for long-term investment. Rather, the relative weakening of the dollar has been primarily driven by speculative currency trading and sentiment (such as the accounting scandals) and that sentiment will most likely reverse over the coming months as the forces depressing sentiment dissipate.
[UPDATED 7/23/02] In any case, the dollar is still quite sound and no true investor should lose any sleep worrying about potential negative implications from a weaker dollar. And, a weaker dollar will boost U.S. exports.
The price of oil fell moderately, and is well below the psychological $30 level.
[UPDATED 7/23/02] In any case, the price of oil price continues to be well-behaved and no true investor should lose any sleep worrying about it.
The price of gold rose moderately. It is now close to the June high.
[UPDATED 12/6/02] The last peak was the June 2 closing high of $327 and the June 3 intraday high of $331.
[UPDATED 7/23/02] In any case, there is nothing about the current price of gold that should give any true investor any reason to lose any sleep.
[UPDATED 7/6/02] The relative calm continues.
[UPDATED 7/23/02] Investors should always be prepared to buy any dip caused by panicky reactions by traders to any incidents.
[UPDATED 10/14/02] The eerie calm continues. There may continue to be attacks or alleged attacks abroad, but the U.S. “homeland” may be relatively immune, at least for now.
[UPDATED 7/23/02] Investors should always be prepared to buy any dip caused by panicky reactions by traders to any incidents.
[ * ] Iraq has delivered its weapons disclosure declaration, ahead of schedule. It may take at least several days if not a week or two before we have a clear view of what is and isn’t in it. Nobody expects that it is truly “complete”, but it will probably be enough to hold off the war hawks for a while. There are probably more “revelations” and surprises in there than the cynics are willing to give Iraq credit for. Although Iraq publicly claims that it has no weapons of mass destruction, those pronouncements probably have less meaning than we normally attach to such words. There is probably plenty of evidence in the declaration that they do indeed have programs in place that could produce WMDs even if they don’t already. There will be plenty of discussion and disagreement on the definitions of what actually constitutes a WMD and a WMD development program and even the meaning of simple words like “possess”. In any case, it is unclear how the market will react to the meeting of this deadline, whether with relief or anxious anticipation of the tedious process that lies ahead.
The inspectors had taken Thursday and Friday off due to the celebration of the end of the Ramadan holy month, but they are back at work.
[ * ] Inspections will ramp up further on Sunday as another group of inspectors arrive in Baghdad. A bunch of helicopters are expected soon.
[ * ] The inspectors had verified on Wednesday that Iraq is still in possession of some number of artillery shells filled with mustard gas. These weapons were still in a sealed building that had been sealed by the previous inspectors back in 1998 (or earlier) but had not gotten around to destroying. These shells are considered a “weapon of mass destruction” by most people. Everybody has known about their existence and everybody has known that everybody knows, so they certainly justify the White House claim of “solid evidence” that Iraq has WMDs and make it curious that Iraq would say that it has no WMDs when they know they have the shells and they know that everybody knows they have them. Maybe somehow the Iraqis do not consider mustard gas to be a WMD. Or maybe the fact that they were “sealed” by the previous inspectors means they are no longer in Iraq’s possession. The Iraqis might argue that the impact of mustard gas is relatively limited so that one of these shells would harm no more than would a 2,000-pound incendiary bomb or a fuel-air explosive which are not technically WMDs. Presumably the mustard gas will be in their declaration, so that they will be “covered” for disclosing its existence and be off the hook for any failure not to disclose.
[UPDATED 10/11/02] My assessment remains that there is virtually no chance of an all-out military conflict with Iraq this year and only a 20% chance next year.
[UPDATED 9/16/02] The bottom line is that investor concern over the sluggish economic recovery and weakness in corporate revenue and earnings growth still weigh more heavily on the market than all the other non-economic factors. Traders merely use Iraq, et al as excuses for any market weakness.
Click here for our more extensive commentary on The Iraq Problem.
Click here for our more extensive commentary on Technology.
No activity.
[UPDATED 8/5/02] Check out our book list.
[UPDATED 7/23/02] Absolutely nothing more is needed at this point other than to simply let the current market-driven corrective processes play themselves out.
Click here for our more extensive commentary on financial reform.
Click here for our more extensive commentary on The Telecom Problem.
The ‘resignations’ of Treasury Secretary O’Neill and top White House economic advisor Lindsey were both a surprise and not a surprise. There had been suggestions for both of them to leave for many months. Both are very solid and competent contributors to the economic team, but neither did much at all to command the respect of either Congress or Wall Street. Neither seemed much in tune with either Washington politics or Wall Street. We’re in a time where raw competence is insufficient. Leadership is required. Or at least the perception of leadership and perception is 99% of everything in both Washington and Wall Street. There are plenty of staff people to do all the heavy lifting work that O’Neill and Lindsey were responsible for, so it is merely a question of who would be sufficiently respected by both Congress and Wall Street. Not to mention who would impress voters in the 2004 election. There may be anxiety until the replacements are in place, but there is already enough momentum in place to keep things moving until then. This dramatic “housecleaning” step seems like a really good move. The decision to ax these two guys was probably a political strategy decision that the administration was vulnerable on economic issues. In any case, people are so anxious about the current state of everything, that almost any change is viewed as a positive. A dramatic sweeping away of the old to make way for the new is always a good strategy when gloom sets in. The good news is that the ‘resignations’ indicate that the administration is very serious about being much more proactive about the economy.
The administration still needs a new guy to head the SEC. I sure wish that they would put former SEC chairman Arthur Leavitt back in at least as an interim measure. He has the stature, respect, knowledge, experience, and motivation to do a fantastic job like nobody else.
[ * ] There is talk that the administration will propose new tax cuts to boost the sluggish economy. There is concern that further tax cuts will balloon the federal budget deficit, but I think that is manageable for the time being. Ultimately, it is economic growth and the health of the economy that determines how much money flows into federal coffers. A sluggish economy, unemployed workers, and a deadbeat stock market dramatically reduce federal tax receipts. Boosting the economy is the right priority to get the federal budget back on track. A combination of monetary and fiscal stimulus is the right approach. The Fed has done their job, so now it’s time for the White House and Congress to do their part. Incidentally, an increase in federal deficit spending will cause an increase in the supply of longer term treasuries which will make them a less attractive investment, which will encourage more money to flow into the stock market. It could also increase the cost of new corporate debt, but many companies don’t want new debt anyway and the improvement in corporate credit risk in a stronger economy will probably more than compensate for higher treasury yields. There is also some risk that the dollar could weaken somewhat relative to other currencies, but that potential impact is way overrated.
[ * ] United Airlines (UAL) is expected to file for bankruptcy very soon. I’m sure that they will be able to reorganize into a leaner, more efficient and profitable airline. But, I do think it would be better if they merged with another airline to dramatically reduce the excess capacity. US Air is already in Bankruptcy, so maybe the two could join up rather than separately reorganize. Obviously there would be antitrust concerns, but there is something called the “failed company doctrine” that could allow the two failures to join up.
[ * ] I read that one of the research analysts believes that Oracle (ORCL) did okay (“high end of range”) for their quarter that ended in November. Oracle reports next week, along with 3Com (COMS), Red Hat (RHAT), Palm (PALM), Micron (MU), Jabil (JBL), Solectron (SLR), Research In Motion (RIMM), Manugistics (MANU), and TIBCO Software (TIBX). The market could rally a bit in advance of the reports in anticipation that results won’t be as bad as had been expected.
No activity.
[UPDATED 12/6/02] The main focus of the market is now on the technical issue of whether the rally is merely correcting before continuing or is fully reversing and will continue to fall. It does look like institutions and “professional investors” (i.e., short/medium-term traders) are doing a fair amount of profit-taking, but it may simply be a changing of the guard as the early birds “retire” and the late-bloomers gradually wade deeper into the market.
It will be important that we not see any dramatic selling on Monday. We don’t need to see a big bounce, but simply not another low for the rally correction.
The market will react to hints from another weekend of Christmas shopping. This is a short season with only two more weekends besides this one before Christmas.
[ * ] There is talk that President Bush will name his new economic team today. The market could rally in anticipation of that announcement, and then either fall back in disappointment or rally in relief depending on the quality of the appointments. I strongly suspect that the White House fully realizes that they need a Treasury Secretary who will inspire Wall Street and promote economic policies that will speed up the economic recovery (and boost the stock market) in the near term so that the President does not end up like his father back in 1992.
[ * ] The market will react to the expected bankruptcy filing for United Airlines (UAL). There will be some further fallout from the bankruptcy (companies on the hook that won’t be paid and will have to write down bad debts), but ultimately it’s for the best and will result in a net improvement for the economy.
The market may be a bit cautious in advance of the Fed FOMC meeting on Tuesday. The Fed is not expected to change interest rates, but will certainly make a statement concerning the outlook and risks for the economy. There won’t be anywhere near as much anxiety ahead of the meeting as there usually is since nobody expects any rate change. But after recent sluggish economic reports, people will be waiting to hear if the Fed suggests a bias towards weakness in the period ahead. The Fed was rather upbeat after the last meeting, and the economic situation is not significantly worse than it was at that time.
The market may react to the filing of the Iraqi weapons disclosure declaration, but it could go either way. There could be relief that a milestone has been met, or anxiety that we don’t know if real progress has been made or what will happen in the coming weeks. The true bottom line is that none of the stuff going on with Iraq is likely to have any significant impact on the business outlook for companies or the overall economy.
My forecast for Monday is that Nasdaq will close in the range -50 to +50. Nasdaq came in at +12 on Friday, modestly above the midpoint of my range of -40 to +50. The market continues to be so crazy that it could go either way, but I still believe there is a longer-term upwards bias even if the near-term bias is all over the map.
[ * ] [UPDATED 12/9/02] The rally is now 41 days old, and 6 days off its peak, but has just bounced off an intermediate low. I’ll give the market six more days before concluding whether we’re truly back to a bear market or just in a trading range (or, heaven forbid, starting on a new bull market). Nasdaq remains stuck below the September 21, 2001 closing level of 1423.19, which is not a good sign, but not completely fatal. It’s going to take some determined buying to push past all this resistance. If Nasdaq can’t break out by the end of the week, the entire rally could fizzle and evaporate. After a new intermediate low is set (Friday) and followed by an initial bounce (Friday also), the important thing is to get a 1-2% bounce 3 to 6 days after that initial bounce (Wednesday through Monday). That second, confirmation bounce would signal that the market is set to rally again. The only thing that has to happen in the 2 days after the initial bounce (Monday and Tuesday) is that a new intermediate low must not be set. It is looking a little gloomy, but Nasdaq still has a good shot at breaking out for a solid year-end “Santa Claus” rally.
[UPDATED 9/25/02] Technically, we are back in a bear market (as of Monday, 9/23) since we have broken below the July 24 low. But whether we continue downwards depends on whether the recent declines were driven by ‘real’ selling or simply due to short-selling. Short-sellers do eventually have to buy their borrowed shares back. The lofty level of the market Volatility Index (VIX) suggests that professional investors are bracing for the worst. That sounds bad, but frequently, those precautions are a harbinger of a turn in the market. The only question is whether the turn occurs within the next few days, a few weeks or a few months.
[UPDATED 8/22/02] The incredible level of disbelief in the current rally strongly suggests that a contrarian bullish view may be appropriate. It’s the exact flip-side of where we were in April and May of 2000 when people refused to belief that the bull market was over and that a bear market had begun.
[UPDATED 6/24/02] Regardless of how crazy the market behaves, the economic recovery is well underway. Market participants may not yet be ready to acknowledge the recovery, but it is inevitable, even if the timing is uncertain. There are more than enough differences in the current market cycle than any in recent memory, but inevitably the market will rise as people anticipate earnings growth down the road. Investing for the long term is still an excellent strategy even if it feels painful in the near term.
[UPDATED 6/24/02] The market will rally when the selling peters out. The market religiously obeys the law of supply and demand, but many buyers have a habit of waiting until the sellers exhaust themselves.
[UPDATED 11/30/02] I rate the probability of serious deflation in the U.S. over the coming year at 1 in 1,000 (0.1%). It’s easy to make a hypothetical case for deflation – in any economy – by simplify hypothesizing that a whole bunch of factors all turn south and policymakers do all the wrong things. Fortunately, that’s not likely to happen in the U.S. Sure, there are plenty of sectors where prices have come down either to excess capacity or suppressed demand, but capacity has a way of adjusting and suppressed (or pent-up) demand eventually has a way of reasserting itself. Policymakers are well aware of previous episodes of deflation, so there is little reason to believe that they will make “all the wrong moves” needed to force the economy into a deflationary depression. In truth, we are actually looking at a higher risk of inflation next year since prices of intermediate goods have risen at ever higher rates for each of the five past months. In short, don’t make the mistake of assuming that hypothetical, theoretical, potential disasters are the likely scenario.
[UPDATED 11/9/02] The ECRI Weekly Leading Index (WLI) tells us that the economy is starting to pick up a little. Not enough to make people happy, but enough to offer encouragement that neither a double-dip recession nor deflation are in our cards.
[UPDATED 10/21/02] The economy is looking even more mixed than before. Although there are plenty of signs of weakness, there are increasingly tantalizing tidbits of improvement. Here in New York, street traffic and business in restaurants has dramatically picked up. In fact, quite a number of new restaurants have opened, with more on the way. And this is despite the weakness on Wall Street. In Q3 tech profits and Q4 guidance, there is certainly a fair amount of weakness, but there have also been quite a number of bright spots, even if they are small bright spots. I suspect that a number of companies did their best to get as much bad news out as possible so that Q4 would be as strong as possible. I also went back and looked at the September Employment report and noticed that the loss of 43,000 non-farm payroll jobs was actually a 478,000 gain once you remove the seasonal adjustment. It turns out that the change from August to September varies widely over the years, so the seasonal adjustment is rather harsh. And finally, the 400,000 “threshold” for initial unemployment claims is not as hard a boundary as it seems, and 401,000 to 425,000 over the past seven weeks probably does not indicate a true employment contraction since the population and workforce have been growing over the years since the 400,000 rule of thumb was concocted. The bottom line is that the economy is hanging in there and even growing a little, even if it is not up to its full potential.
[UPDATED 11/7/02] I’ve decreased my estimate of the probability of a double-dip recession to 10% (from 20%) due to hefty half-point Fed rate cut. I still think a double-dip is unlikely, but I do want to quantify my beliefs as well as risks.
[UPDATED 6/24/02] There is absolutely no question that the economic recovery in the U.S. is going at a somewhat slower pace than had been expected by this point in time, but the recovery is well along nonetheless. We are still winding our way through an extended turning point, but virtually every day brings news that we are making incremental progress, even as there are still plenty of negative data points as well. Impatient observers fail to recognize that turning points are bumpy affairs and that negative data points do not necessarily mean that something has gone wrong.
[UPDATED 6/24/02] Spending on technology has picked up only modestly, at best. And the telecom sector continues to decline. That said, the recovery is in fact well along, with the manufacturing sector leading the way. Manufacturers have plenty of excess capacity so that they can increase production without spending too much and without needing to hire many workers, yet.
[UPDATED 6/24/02] Even as unemployment continues to rise modestly, actual employment has already begun to rise, although at a very modest pace. The average paycheck has also been rising, and at a rate faster than inflation. That combination of more people working with larger paychecks means that overall national income is rising, which is a very good thing and will continue to fuel consumer spending.
[UPDATED 6/24/02] Companies are reluctant to dramatically increase their spending on technology until they become more comfortable that ‘final demand’ is increasing at a dependable pace. Demand is increasing, but at a slow enough pace that companies are proceeding with great caution. But as each day goes by, an additional increment of that caution evaporates. It may be as painful as watching grass grow or watching paint dry, but investors can be sure that their patience will be rewarded. Sure, it will take some time to get back to ‘normal’, but that result is inevitable even if the timing is uncertain.
[ * ] [UPDATED 12/9/02] I don’t yet have a forecast for Q4 GDP. The accounting is so inscrutable as to defy any rational forecast. People expect economic activity to slow dramatically from the pace of Q3, so real GDP growth in the range of -1.5% to 3.5% (midpoint of 1.0%) is possible. A survey of economists by The Economist shows an expectation for real GDP growth in 2002 of 2.4% (low of 2.3 to 2.6), which implies Q4 GDP growth of -0.7% (low of -1.1 to 0.1). The same survey forecast real GDP growth of 2.6% in 2003 (low of 2.0 to 3.3). There was no hint or suggestion of deflation in these survey results. In fact, The Economist poll for consumer prices forecast a gain of 2.1% in 2003.
[UPDATED 12/4/02] Even Stephen Roach, the gloom-and-doom economist from Morgan Stanley, is forecasting real Q4 GDP growth of 1% (as of 12/2/02). He had been adamant that the economy would have a double-dip recession, but now admits that we have escaped two “double-dip alerts” this year. He does still expect that there will be more double-dip scares in the months and quarters ahead. He is a very smart former-Fed economist and even though I don’t share his gloominess, at least he does offer a solid lower bound for the likely performance of the economy.
[UPDATED 11/27/02] A panel of professional forecasters of the National Association for Business Economics (NABE) estimates that real Q4 GDP should grow at a rate of 1.4%. Q1 GDP should grow at a 2.5% rate. Full year 2003 GDP should grow at a rate approaching 3%. The survey was taken from November 9th to 14th.
[UPDATED 11/8/02] The Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is still uncertain whether the recession truly ended of whether the end was merely temporary with a second dip to follow. In their words (as of November 5), “The behavior of the economy in the first eight months of 2002 indicates that the decline in activity that began last year may have come to an end. But recent data indicate that additional time is needed to be confident about the interpretation of the movements of the economy last year and this year.”
[UPDATED 8/14/02] We are still in the turning point where the view in front of your nose is mixed and confusing. Recent economic reports have been weak or mixed, so we probably need another month of data to be able to see where we are going. For me personally, it’s a no-brainer that we very close to the final edge of the turning point, but so many people have lost confidence that they need a truly monumental level of evidence to believe again. But that’s always the way it is with turning points: it’s darkest before the dawn.
[UPDATED 8/24/02] I’ve reset the Tech Stock ‘Safe’ Signal back to 0.00 since it has the last change is over six weeks old. There needs to be a sense of ‘freshness’ to the outlook for tech business that simply isn’t there right now.
[UPDATED 8/24/02] Our ‘safe’ signal requires at least 20% (1 out of 5, or 10 out of 50) of the top 50 tech companies to signal acceleration. Expect one or two quarters to elapse from the time of the first indications of an upturn and the return of solid growth. The theory is that the stock market should begin a sustainable rally four to six months in advance of the return of strong growth. Many companies are still trimming Q3 forecasts, and virtually nobody is beating the drum for a great Q4. A lot of people are saying that even Q1 of 2003 will be sluggish. That said, if you want to get the early stock market gains, you'll have to jump the gun and get in before our signal triggers. But if you do, you have to be prepared for some significant volatility and possibly some big losses. You have to decide for yourself whether you want safety in the short run or higher potential returns in the long run.
[UPDATED 9/14/02] For our complete list of resources, click here.
[NEW 5/25/02] DISCLAIMER: I cannot and do not offer any recommendations of stocks to buy or sell. I may on occasion discuss companies that I am considering or myself have bought or sold, but the reader must do their own research before making their own purchase or sale decision. It is never a good idea to buy a stock just because someone else tells you to or even merely mentions a company in a favorable light.
Jack Krupansky -- The Unrepentant Optimist (Click here for Jack's Bio)
Updated: December 08, 2002 11:28:25 PM -0500
Copyright © 2002 John W. Krupansky d/b/a Base Technology